出刊年月/Date of Publishing

2004.09

所屬卷期/Vol. & No.   第34卷第3期 Vol. 34, No. 3

類型/Type                 研究議題 Research Issue

篇名/Title
Rights to Liberty and Fair Trial—Sacrificed in the Name of Anti-Terrorism
人身自由權與公平審判權——因反恐之名而犧牲

作者/Author
廖福特 Fort Fu-Te Liao

頁碼/Pagination
pp. 511-553

摘要
當一個國家加入國際人權條約，其有義務在其國內實踐之，即使此國家是處於反恐時期。本文乃檢視美國與英國以反恐之名所採取之法律措施是否符合國際人權標準。本文著重於三項議題。首先，這兩個國家以何種標準定義恐怖份子。其次，所謂恐怖份子所受之待遇為何。第三，他們是如何受審判的。本文強調人權保障與反恐措施不應是衝突的，而應是共存之目標。本文認為美國與英國以反恐之名所制訂之法律及命令，並不盡然都符合國際人權標準，同時亦應廢除或修正。

Abstract
When a state adheres to international human rights treaties, it is obliged to implement them domestically within its jurisdiction, even in a time of anti-terrorism. This paper therefore examines whether the measures taken in the name of anti-terrorism by the US and the UK are in accordance with international human rights standards.

It focuses on three main issues. The first issue relates to the criteria used to define terrorists. Secondly, once identified, how will they be detained, and thirdly how will they be tried? It emphasizes that human rights protections and anti-terrorism measures should not be conflicting aims but parallel goals. It argues that the laws and orders enacted by the US and the UK may not always conform to international human rights standards, and should be rescinded or amended.

關鍵字/Key Word
人身自由權、公平審判權、反恐、愛國者法案、2001年反恐法
right to liberty, right to fair trial, anti-terrorism, USA PATRIOT ACT, Anti-Terrorism Act 2001

全文下載 PDF Download

DOI
--

學門分類/Subject
法學 Law