出刊年月/Date of Publishing

2009.03

所屬卷期/Vol. & No.   第39卷第1期 Vol. 39, No. 1

類型/Type                 研究論文 Research Article

篇名/Title
不可說的在言噤聲：藍騰的反色情論證
Unspeakable Illocutionary Silencing—Langton’s Free Speech Argument Against Pornography

作者/Author
鄭光明 Kuang-ming Cheng

頁碼/Pagination
pp. 169-224

摘要
色情刊物會使得婦女遭到「噤聲」的命運，因而侵害了婦女的言論自由嗎？對此，女性主義者麥肯能的回答是肯定的，而許多自由主義者的回答則是否定的，甚至認為這個主張非常荒謬。為此，藍騰特別援引英國語言哲學家奧斯丁的說話做行論，並主張：色情刊物之所以侵害了婦女的言論自由，其原因在於色情刊物使得婦女「不能拿話做事」，而這等於使得婦女的言論不能出現在言論自由市場中。本文將主張：藍騰的主張會課以說話者和聽者太多義務；為此，我們必須主張一種對聽者不要求任何「最低限度接收度」的言論自由觀，以避免上述問題。

Abstract
Famous anti-pornography feminists, Catharine MacKinnon and Rae Langton believe that pornography harms women in a very special and serious way: by silencing them or violating their civil right to freedom of speech. Langton believes that an analysis of the concept of speech acts shows that pornography silences women’s voices. Therefore, pornography destroys political liberty and should not be allowed. Pornography may thus make potential speech acts unspeakable for women, not by preventing them from producing or distributing sounds and scrawls, but by preventing women from doing things with their words. In what follows, I will argue that Langton’s view would impose a burdensome range of duties on individuals. This suggests that there are some powerful liberal reasons for thinking that the right to free speech should not include any minimal receptiveness requirement on the part of audiences.

關鍵字/Key Word
色情權利、說話做行論、麥肯能、藍騰、不可說的在言噤聲
a right to pornography, speech-act theory, Catharine MacKinnon, Rae Langton, unspeakable illocutionary silencing

全文下載 PDF Download

DOI
--

學門分類/Subject
哲學 Philosophy