出刊年月/Date of Publishing

2012.03

所屬卷期/Vol. & No.   第42卷第1期 Vol. 42, No. 1

類型/Type                 研究論文 Research Article

篇名/Title
程序主義與反思 (身) 法典範之爭：從哈伯馬斯對韋伯法理論之批判談起
Disputes over Proceduralist and Reflexive Paradigms of Law─Analysis of Habermas’s Critique of Weber’s Legal Theory

作者/Author
李俊增 Chiun-Tseng Lee

頁碼/Pagination
pp. 83-165

摘要
在《經濟與社會》乙書中，韋伯討論現代法律隨著社會理性化出現之形式性質，並強烈質疑福利國家出現導致之法律的實質化。韋伯此一有關形式法律與實質法律之原創性的分析引發了此後數十年的論戰。面對福利國家法律實質化產生之問題，法律社會學家屠布涅亦從系統論之觀點，提出反思 (身) 法之法律形式，企圖以之取代實質法律。哈伯馬斯則提出程序主義法典範，希望能有效解決其中之論爭。本文從哈伯馬斯對於韋伯法社會學之詮釋、批判與回應為起點，進一步以程序主義法典範為中心，來探討程序主義與反思 (身) 法典範之論爭。

Abstract
With the emergence and development of the modern welfare state, classical liberal conceptions of the legal norm have been undermined to a great extent. This trend has provoked a heated debate between sociologists, political scientists and legal scholars. Since publication, Max Weber’s famous discussion of antiformal tendencies in modern law, in Economy and Society, has defined the terms of the debate over welfare state law. In response to the problems resulting from the law’s materialization, G. Teubner proposes a reflexive law model. J. Habermas offers his proceduralist paradigm of law and hopes it will satisfactorially answer the debates between the liberal, social-welfare and reflexive models. This paper hopes to show that Habermas’s paradigm proves to be a creative force while raising some questions.

關鍵字/Key Word
形式法律、實質法律、反思 (身) 法律、程序主義法典範、社會法
formal law, deformalized law, reflexive law, proceduralist paradigm, social law

全文下載 PDF Download

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.201203.0083

學門分類/Subject
法學 Jurisprudence